Who Decides What Science Matters? The Editorial Power Shaping America's Research Agenda
The decisions made behind closed editorial doors at top-tier journals do far more than manage manuscript queues — they actively define the boundaries of legitimate scientific inquiry. By scrutinizing how subjective criteria such as 'novelty' and 'significance' are applied, researchers and institutions are beginning to confront a structural problem that has long operated in plain sight. Emerging editorial models now offer a path toward more transparent and inclusive gatekeeping practices.